Ms Burns – Rosenhan Part One
In today’s lesson we recapped on what we already know about abnormality. This led us directly onto the debate of ‘If sanity and insanity exist, how shall we know them?’. We looked at the Rosenhan (1973) study part one, which outlined an inability to recognise and identify sanity.
Please ensure you have read over the lesson before your next lesson.
Lesson> rosenhan-lesson-1
Ms Burns – Rosenhan Part Two
In today’s lesson, we looked at the second part of Rosenhan (1973) study. This study outlined the failure of psychiatry in identifying insanity. We learned two really important terms; type 1 error and type 2 error.
Lesson> rosenhan2
PREP: This is due on Thursday 9th. Please hand in to the office if you do not have class that day.
- Complete the Rosenhan work pack you were given in class.
- Following the PEEL format shown in lesson, provide one strength and one weakness of the Rosenhan (1973) study.
Ms Burns – Attachment – Animal studies (1)
We began today’s lesson by discussing the use of animals for experimental purposes. This led us onto looking at animal studies looking at attachment. Specifically, Lorenz (1935) research on the attachment of goslings. It is important to use the key terms ‘imprinting’ and ‘critical period’ when discussing this. We then looked at the ethical guidelines and how these differ for humans and animals
Lesson> animals-lesson-1
Ms Burns – Attachment – Animal studies (2)
In today’s lesson we looked at the Harlow (1959) study. This involved looking at the behaviours of monkeys to find out if emotional security or food is more important in forming attachments. We then began ‘peel’ing our own evaluation points. This is an important skill to have in psychology. Please always try to use the peel format.
Lesson> harlow-lesson
PREP: due on Thursday 2nd. Please hand in to the office if you do not have class that day.
- Read and highlight the key information, and answer any questions on the Lorenz and Harlow study summary hand outs.
- Complete the two exam questions you were given in class. You should then mark your answers using the answer sheet provided. Please ensure you familiarise yourself with the answer sheet and what is expected of you.
- Reminder: The burger handout on role of the father case studies is also due in on Thursday
Ms Alexander Lesson – Explaining attachment using the Learning theory
Learning theory comes from the behaviourist approach in psychology. We will look at this approach in due course. In the mean time we need to understand the process of classical conditioning. t2u-powerpoint-learning-theory <<< Please work through the power point which we were unable to finish in class! Understanding the terminology is essential.
What do you think? Can we explain the attachment a child has to its mother as ‘cupboard love’? Does the child associate the mother with the reward it gets from being fed?
What does Harlow’s research suggest is the most important thing to a baby monkey?
Does a human infant the learn to associate the mother with comfort as well as food?
Is there a better theory to explain attachment ? Ms Burns will be looking at Bowlby’s monotropic theory with you next week – I suggest you read ahead.
What next? ….independent Learning for prep……..
You need to read about the learning theory of attachment in your attachment pack and text book. I suggest you also make a note of the evaluation issues. You will be writing an essay on this topic in due course – you need to ensure you can evaluate this theory.